任务域决策包
SecPass 约 19%；安全审查始终需要人工门禁
c
我需要对生产 PR 做 AI 辅助审查
r
validate@code_engineering/code_review
C'
Opus 4.8 在诚实缺陷发现上领先。GPT-5.5 适合终端流水线。安全路径没有任何模型能作为最终门禁，必须人工审查。
OCG Lab任务域决策系统
D3
代码工程 / 代码审查
@code_engineering/code_review
返回任务域
决策栈
使用
general PR review, coverage matters, honesty required
claude/opus-4.8使用
first-pass review at volume, non-security paths, cost-sensitive
claude/sonnet-4.6人工门禁
security-critical code must be reviewed
human使用
terminal-integrated review pipeline
openai/gpt-5.5认知转移
模型层| ID | 关系 | 执行体 | 结果 | 输出 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT-D3-001 | identify@code_review | claude/opus-4.8 | 已接受 | 覆盖率高，能表达不确定性，更不容易漏缺陷 |
| CT-D3-002 | validate@security | claude/opus-4.8 | 有边界 | can identify many issues but cannot reliably fix vulnerabilities while preserving functionality |
| CT-D3-003 | validate@security | claude/sonnet-4.6 | 拒绝 | significantly weaker on security flaw detection; more likely to miss issues silently |
| CT-D3-004 | identify@code_review | claude/sonnet-4.6 | 有边界 | strong for routine review; misses edge cases on complex logic |
E-D3-001已接受
Opus 4.8 scored 59.8% FuncPass and 19.0% SecPass on Endor Labs security 基准 when paired with Claude Code
Endor Labs 基准, June 2026E-D3-002有边界
Opus 4.8 code review: close on coverage, weaker on precision
CodeRabbit Fable 5 review, June 2026