@code_engineering/code_review
SecPass 19% across all models; security review always needs human gate
I need AI-assisted review for a production PR
validate@code_engineering/code_review
Opus 4.8 leads on honest flaw detection. GPT-5.5 for terminal pipelines. No model is a reliable final gate on security paths; human review required.
general PR review, coverage matters, honesty required
claude/opus-4.8first-pass review at volume, non-security paths, cost-sensitive
claude/sonnet-4.6security-critical code must be reviewed
humanterminal-integrated review pipeline
openai/gpt-5.5| ID | Relation | Actor | Result | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT-D3-001 | identify@code_review | claude/opus-4.8 | accepted | high coverage; honest about uncertainty; less likely to miss flaws |
| CT-D3-002 | validate@security | claude/opus-4.8 | bounded | can identify many issues but cannot reliably fix vulnerabilities while preserving functionality |
| CT-D3-003 | validate@security | claude/sonnet-4.6 | rejected | significantly weaker on security flaw detection; more likely to miss issues silently |
| CT-D3-004 | identify@code_review | claude/sonnet-4.6 | bounded | strong for routine review; misses edge cases on complex logic |
Opus 4.8 scored 59.8% FuncPass and 19.0% SecPass on Endor Labs security benchmark when paired with Claude Code
Endor Labs benchmark, June 2026Opus 4.8 code review: close on coverage, weaker on precision
CodeRabbit Fable 5 review, June 2026